RSS

The Slippery Slope of Victim Blaming

This is a response to a post at Very Smart Brothas entitled, “Rape Responsibility,” and the Fine Line Between Victim-Blaming and Common Sense.

My problem with talking about personal responsibility is that this discussion has a double standard among crimes. Let me hit you with an analogy:

Let’s say I leave my door unlocked and I get robbed. I pull in the driveway just in time to see the robber leaving my house. I go to the police, press charges and take my case all the way to court. Now…even though I left my door unlocked, nobody is going to question that I didn’t want to get robbed. Nobody is going to assert that old dude is wrong for robbing me. Nobody is going to ask me if I knew the guy and even I do know the guy, nobody will say that has any bearing on the wrongness of what he did.

Now, let’s say I drink too much at a party and get raped. I wake up just in time to see the guy’s face as he rolls off of me. From the time I report the crime to the time it goes to trial (IF I can even get the case that far) my entire character is called into question. What was  I wearing? Because if I had on a dress that was too tight and too short, I was asking for it.  How many people have I slept with? Because if I’m not a virgin, I must be a slut. Is he famous? Because if he is I’m clearly lying to get as his money. Was I drinking? Because if so, I shouldn’t have put myself in that situation (this last was actually alluded to in the VSB post). If that’s not convincing, watch the video below for an illustration.

See the problem here? Victim blaming and character assassination are part of the reason why the DSK rape case never made it to trial. Because the maid had lied before in the course of her lifetime (and I ask you, who wouldn’t lie to get the hell out of a war torn country???), she wasn’t a reliable witness. There is no other crime that a person can commit where the victim is so often painted as the architect of her own demise.

The situation becomes even more complex when a woman is raped by her husband, boyfriend or date. Contrary to popular belief, most rapists are not prowling around at clubs and college parties waiting for a woman to get too drunk–they are men who know their victims, often very closely, and may have even had sex with them before. Consent is a moving target and can be revoked at any time. Women are taught from a young age what they can do to protect themselves. What men are NOT taught, and need to be, is that any time consent is debatable you need to zip it up and walk away. It protects not just women, but men too.

After the VSB post went up, the flurry of negative comments led to an edit, which contains this quote:

“But, my whole point is that young men AND young women need to be taught how to behave around the opposite sex, and I don’t see how saying that suggests that I think women should be held responsible for their own rapes.”

*forehead smack*

The problem is that once you start saying a woman should behave a “certain way” around men to protect herself, you de facto state, however inadvertently, that if she gets rape it’s at least partially her fault. I don’t care if a woman stands on top of the bar and shouts, “Everybody f*** me!” If she is passed out drunk when a guy tries to sleep with her, IT’S RAPE. If she shouted it sober, sleeps with four guys, starts making out with a fifth one and then changes her mind but he doesn’t stop…IT’S RAPE. No ifs, ands, or buts about it. If women need to be taught how to behave around men, then we all need to be taught how to live life. Don’t park at the back of the parking lot because if you get kidnapped, it’s your fault. Don’t drive with the radio on because it will distract you and if you get in an accident, it’s your fault. Don’t ever go anywhere after nightfall because if you get robbed, it’s your fault. Doesn’t that sound absurd? Then why isn’t it absurd that we insist rape victims behave with nun-like demureness before we believe that they’re innocent?

 

 

 
1 Comment

Posted by on January 24, 2012 in current events, Great Debates, society

 

Tags: , ,

Just gotta make it

#NoTreySongz

Just started part deux of getting worked to death, as per the law school adage. I’m finishing up my required classes, HALLELUJAH! because those are always the ones that bore me the most. The first week of class has ended and here are my impressions.

Evidence- Required. Goodbye Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hello Rules of Evidence. I survived the lottery for the favored professor’s class. The material is less than scintillating but so far the professor has displayed a very thorough and methodical teaching style, so it looks like this won’t be as bad as it could be.

Statutory Law- Required. WHY we need a required class on interpretation of laws when you have to do that in every. single. class. in law school is utterly beyond me. I’ve got the same prof I had for Civil Lawsuits in the fall and I like her teaching style, so I hope she can make it bearable.

Intellectual Property Law- I have no hope of taking the patent bar unless I go back for a science or engineering Master’s, but as a writer and blogger I’m interested in copyrights and such for my own edification. Plus Professor Contracts (hereafter known as Professor Wolverine, for his hairdo) is teaching it, and that class was my best grade in law school so far. He’s really funny and the case material is actually interesting half the time so I think it will be a good class.

Domestic Relations- Dealing with family protective orders all summer piqued my interest so I subscribed to the ABA Section of Family Law last semester. They put out a newsletter with summaries of notable family law cases and I found myself reading them with interest, so I knew I had to sign up for DR. The professor is a bit of a fuddy duddy, but so far I like the material.

Gender and the Law- I originally wanted to take First Amendment Law, both for personal interest and bar prep, but one look at the syllabus told me it was too intense to take with four other substantive classes–especially considering I have a three finals the week before Tex’s graduation and one the Monday after?!? Madness. The G&L final is a take home due on that next Friday. But it’s a very small class and heavily discussion based so I have high hopes for this one as well.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 22, 2012 in 2L, classes, law school

 

A Prior Engagement Pt. 2

The longest engagement ever is starting to approach an end date.

I say that because Tex and I have known we wanted to get married since summer 2009. However, finishing school was so far away that we didn’t get formally engaged until last spring. Now that he’ll be graduating in four months and I’m halfway through my law degree, we can finally (finally! FINALLY!) start to plan our wedding!!!!!!!!!!!

Clearly, I’m totes excited.

My dad started his own business last summer. It’s going well and he’s pretty confident business will continue to improve, so he said he will pay for the wedding. The biggest costs will be the venue and the catering, so that means I will likely be able to get married on my target date of October 2013. Obviously we’ll be paying for our rings, but I also plan on paying for my own dress so that I can get what I want–I might have 2 different dresses for the wedding and the reception. I’ll be doing my own invitations and decor too. I’m pretty handy (my sister and I spent a lot of time doing projects with our mom) so with the help of some idea books and a few trips to Michael’s, we’re going to get cracking! One of my aunts did my cousin’s wedding photos and they turned out great, so I’m going to see if she will do our engagement photos this summer.

I’m still in the brainstorming phase, but it’s exciting to finally be able to talk about the wedding without feeling like it’s pointless because it’s so far away. 2011 flew by, and with graduation and the bar exam taking up the first half of 2013 I want to start researching some stuff early on. I’m hoping to get the venue and officiant secured by the end of this year if possible, as well as a color and decor scheme. That way, come next July all I have to do is start putting things into motion and find a dress.

Even better, although Sissy is not formally engaged (yet), she and her boyfriend have decided to get married! So there might be two weddings next year, you never know :-D

 

 
1 Comment

Posted by on January 4, 2012 in engagement, getting married, wedding stuff

 

Tags: , ,

Happy New Year!

It’s 2012 and I’m excited, despite all of the predictions for the Apocalypse. (Did anyone ever consider that maybe the Mayans just got tired of counting up?) I have several goals for this year and for once, I wrote them down. Generally, they are to

  1. Eat more fruits & veggies
  2. Drink more water
  3. Exercise at least 150 min/wk
  4. Incorporate strength training 2x/wk
  5. Limit the use of heat on my hair
  6. Cut back on frivolous spending
  7. Engage more with my schoolwork

In my own personal notes, I have scheduled specific days for workouts (I’m going to become a morning gym rat because I get too easily sidetracked after class); linked my accounts and created a budget with Learnvest.com; and picked a class schedule that will hopefully keep me from getting too overwhelmed. The lack of 8:30am classes will improve my knowledge retention enormously on its own.

2012 is the year of me getting my life together, because I won’t have time to in 2013–law school graduation, the bar exam, and likely a wedding? I get tired just thinking about it. But the engagement party will be this summer(!!!), which is a good incentive for me to stick to my fitness because I want to look sexy in the pictures with my luxurious natural coils. It’s really about long term health though–your metabolism drops from age 25 on, and I want a diabetes/heart attack/stroke-free middle and old age. Lastly, I have a newfound interest in family law so I need to work on my grades to be more competitive. There’s no sense in sabotaging myself.

In other news, the holidays were fun. I got a bunch of Macy’s gift cards that I’m saving for when the shopping bug hits, and some new books. Visiting Tex’s family was super chill and relaxing. I hung out with Sissy today and she dropped the bomb that although she’s not engaged, she and her beau are planning to get there in the near future! I’m psyched. Her Christmas gift was an ancestry DNA test–I am part Nigerian (Yoruba tribe) and French on my mom’s side of the family. I know nothing of Nigeria, but it’s so great to be able to reclaim part of the heritage that slavery stole from me. I’m not just “regular” black with no roots anymore. Sure I’m part Muskogee, but they don’t have any reservations to my knowledge. So that was a gift that kept on giving and shows how considerate he is. I’m happy for her. I also met my brother’s new girlfriend, who I like a lot more than his last one (no diss, but they just weren’t compatible in my eyes).

All in all it’s been an eye opening time for me. I get my wisdom teeth out on Friday (let’s all pray that the anesthesia doesn’t kill me) and then I have another week of rest & recuperation before school starts back up. I really want to live more purposefully this year. I’m responsible for my own health, wealth and happiness and I will act like that.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 3, 2012 in engagement, life, musings, weight loss

 

Tags: ,

Just do it

After the word went out via my Facebook status that I was done with finals, my phone was blowing up. Mostly with family, but the love was still gratifying :-) Anyway, one of my guy friends wanted to get a woman’s perspective on a problem he was having with his girlfriend. Dude used to be a player, but he finally found someone who stimulates him on multiple levels. However, she’s a little older (28 to his 25) and looking towards marriage, something he’s not ready for at all. He had an analogy about marriage that was…interesting to say the least.

Marriage is one big surrender ceremony. You tell all your friends that you’ve finally given in and they come cheer you on as the woman who captured you walks down the aisle wrapped in a white flag and you live miserably ever after.

He also says that human brains don’t finish developing until age 25, so ostensibly the person you fall in love with before that age could be completely different. Also, he wants to travel and focus on his career before he settles down so he doesn’t have any regrets.

The Ex (we’re frociates–not quite friends, not quite associates) would probably agree with that statement. He said that nobody under the age of 28 should even be thinking about marriage, because our lives are so unstable and there’s just so much to do.

I asked Tex what he thought about that, and why so many people are so hard on marriage. His response was that some people just don’t want the extra responsibility and emotional ties that come with marriage. You have to check in and take someone else’s feelings into account.

Really? Is that all? Wusses.

I’ve been dealing with other people’s feelings  my entire life. I’m naturally empathetic, so even with casual acquaintances I try not to be rude or dismissive unless they’ve done something to warrant that type of treatment. My parents divorced when I was 13, and ever since I’ve walked a tightrope of compromise. I’ve been living my life on a schedule since I was pledging and haven’t looked back–Google Calendar is my BFF. I’ve never been a person who lived some footloose, fancy free, spontaneous life so having to tell someone where I am isn’t a burden. I have to call my parents to assure them I’ve arrived safely whenever I drive back and forth from school, and I check my schedule on a daily basis anyway so it’s nothing for me to tell you what’s on it.

I really dislike the notion that being married means you can’t have a life outside of that person. As much as I love being with and around Tex, I need friends besides him. Doing things without Tex gives me a chance to  miss him, and it gives us something to talk about so we don’t get bored of each other! I’ll admit that I would hate for him to take a trip overseas without me. But if  his boys wanted to do a weekend in Vegas? Eh…I wouldn’t be thrilled but  I wouldn’t stop him from going either. I trust him and he’s not going there to stay so what’s the big deal?

I think that in a lot of ways, marriage is something where you just have to jump in the pool. Whether you get married or not, nothing in life is guaranteed. I think that we spend a lot of time thinking about the wedding ceremony and all the ways the marriage can go wrong, and not enough about what type of person we want to support us through life’s struggles. Married or not, life will not always be easy. But if you believe in marriage, you shouldn’t let fear cheat you out of it.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on January 2, 2012 in life, relationships

 

Nobody says this, but…

Good relationships are a lot of work.

Not the kind of work that leaves you cranky and drained, but work nonetheless. I was shooting the breeze with my mom today and reflecting on the fact that things change when you get engaged. You look at relationships differently and people look at you differently. For instance, when it comes to dating woes I just keep my mouth shut because someone will inevitably remark, “That’s easy for you to say cuz you got a man!”

*le sigh*

I’m learning more and more as I get older that when people complain, 99% of the time they don’t want a solution or a new perspective, but validation of their feelings. I don’t do pity parties so I just shut up, which keeps me from being subjected to the same stories over and over. Women tend to act like relationships are just this magical fairy tale romance that clothes your life in glitter and rainbows. And I’ll admit, it is like sometimes. Every once in a while I’ll look at Tex or think about him and feel like my heart could burst with love for him.

Most of the time, things aren’t nearly so dramatic. And since we don’t see each other every day, we have to communicate ALL the time. Some people don’t think an hour’s drive qualifies as long distance, but really it does. There is no sulking until he gets the point because he might not see me for two weeks to get the point. When I get upset, I can be very cordial. I will speak calmly and evenly while seething inside and you wouldn’t know it unless you can see the subtle tensing of my facial expressions and body language. You can’t hug it out over the phone and there is no makeup sex (well I suppose there could be, but no, thank you).

My parents always told me never to be jealous of anyone else because everyone comes with their own gifts and problems in life. Better for you to have the ones that you know how to deal with. I fully admit that I am blessed to have met my future husband so early in life. I’m just as surprised as any of you! It was a whole lot of serendipity that put us in the right place, at the right time to be together. Also true, on the whole I’m pretty good at anything academic. But you know what I would love to be? A creative genius–one of those people who oozes art, poetry, and music, with perfect pitch and virtuoso talent. I would love to have charisma–to be the person who never met a stranger and can’t even imagine what an awkward pause is like, who is never at a loss for words and loved by everybody. I would love to be a sophisticate–the woman with the body and face that turns heads, eclectically elegant style and perfectly coiffed hair who can work magic with a makeup brush.

But I’m not any of those people. I can play decently well on the viola, I’ve written some poems that weren’t cringe inducing, I can socialize without falling over myself in self-consciousness and I’ll probably never be a victim of What Not to Wear. I don’t have everything I wish for, but nobody can have everything. God gives us challenges so that we can better appreciate the blessings. I wouldn’t want any of those things if it meant I had to wait another 10, 20, 20 years to meet Tex or never meet him at all. This is why I hate to be the object of anyone’s envy–the road to seemingly having it all together wasn’t quick or fun. I spent a lot of nights up late writing prayers in my notebook, wondering why I couldn’t just breeze through life like everyone else. But it got me to where I am today so I can’t be mad at it.

If the grass is greener on the other side, you can bet the water bill is through the roof…

But

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 22, 2011 in relationships

 

A welcome respite

Three finals, a feverish paper writing session and one long semester later, I am done with 2L fall and officially halfway through law school! HALLELUJAH THANK YA JESUS!

I had a week in between finals, so last weekend I went to the City to see the Wale concert with Jaleesa. And rapidly came to the conclusion that I am too old (mentally) to be going to rap concerts. I hate to be one of those catty girls but some of the outfits I saw were just plain inappropriate and reeked of desperation to boot. It’s high time we started back promoting the aesthetic appeals of proper foundation garments (read: slips, girdles, and well fitting bras)!

While I was there, I had lunch with my neo. She crossed right before I had finals in the spring and she went home to California for the summer; I just never managed to hook up with her before then. But she’s mad cool (although I don’t expect anything less from a Glamorous Gamma Rho chapter ace!). It was a good time. I’m attending a grad chapter meeting in Orangeville after spring semester starts, and I’m thinking about joining. Tex has senior design, so I won’t be making as many trips to see him because he’ll be swamped in work. I love my law school besties, but I need people to hang with who don’t know anything about res judicata!

I got home today and it’s nice to finally be able to breathe. I’ve already started touching base with Maya, Sunny and Porsche, I have plans to go see Sherlock Holmes with Sissy and it looks like I’m going to have a lot of fun this break despite my upcoming oral surgery (two of my wisdom teeth are getting removed, ugh). I also plan to take some time for spiritual reflection by going to church. Usually listening to gospel music is church enough for me, but sometimes I miss singing the old hymns and reciting the apostles’ creed. [Favorite line: "from thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead." It's so theatrical!]

I’m just glad to have nothing but fun, optional things on my plate for a bit. I did do the anal law student thing and obsessively rechecked the schedule (I need my all my spring electives to be relatively easy B’s). Turns out I will be dropping First Amendment Law–it’s too intense to be taking with four other classes, especially when one of them is Evidence! I’m going to sign up for Gender and the Law instead.

Anyway. Enough school talk, these next few weeks are going to be nothing but fun, food and holiday spirit!

 

 

 
1 Comment

Posted by on December 19, 2011 in 2L, life

 

Is Marriage for White People?

The analyview returns! I got a free copy of Dr. Richard Banks’ book, Is Marriage for White People from the professor who advises the BLSA group at Orange Law. It was a good read and surprisingly easy to get through; despite my impending finals, I managed to get through in just a few hours.

Thesis 1: The “marriage crisis” is not unique to black folks.

Hallelujah! Finally somebody said it, and it was a man, so people might actually believe it (true, but *eye roll* all the same). Marriage has been on the decline for decades now, and a lot of it has to do with the “success gap”–women both white and black are surpassing their male counterparts in education and income. However, the negative effects of societal trends are exacerbated in the black community by racial baggage.

Thesis 2: Marriage is a market.

A) The Man Shortage. We see the usual suspects: high rates of black male incarceration, interracial marriage of middle class, educated black men, and the success gap. However, he points out that the men who end up in prison are overwhelmingly not the men that successful black women are looking for anyway. The interracial marriage statistics are a bit more worrisome though–black men outmarry at three times the rate of black women (more than one in five black men, vs. less than one in ten black women). Finally, traditional ideas of marriage promote a male breadwinner. But given that black women earn college degrees at more than twice the rate of black men, and a labor market in which high wage industrial jobs are disappearing, that’s increasingly implausible.

Banks opens Chapter 4 with a bit of sensationalism on “man sharing”. He includes an anecdote from a physician with a largely black female population who says “Women are not surprised by the fact that their men are cheating on them. .  .  .They’re not shocked and they aren’t mad.”  o_O Really though??? So white women never get cheated on and when they do, they go slash some tires? Moving on, a 1980s study done at the University of Chicago did find that African-Americans were the least likely of all groups to have a monogamous relationship. In one predominantly black neighborhood, almost two out of every five men had simultaneous relationships with more than one sex partner. Now, the footnotes (I’m a history major and law student, how can I not read footnotes?) do state that these conclusions were drawn from much smaller sample sizes than that of the study as a whole, and thus the inference may not lie with the greater population. I know from the experiences of myself and others that man sharing definitely does happen, but I don’t know if I want to believe that women are just meekly putting up with it. Unfortunately, the rising STD contraction rates of black women and articles like this aren’t coming from nowhere.

B) Purchasing Power and Brand Loyalty. The simple fact is that middle class, educated black women outnumber black men who are the same. So black men hold all the cards, and they exploit them. It’s nothing personal, just human nature. Banks points out that many women put up with philandering behavior because they don’t want to be alone but insist on getting something out of the deal. In exchange for their acquiescence, they want expensive trips, dinners and trinkets. However, this perpetuates a cycle of distrust and discord. Successful black men now have three major disincentives to marry: the numbers on their side, women are supposedly gold diggers, and black women will remain loyal no matter what. Meanwhile, women resent men for expecting a lack of commitment with no repercussions, given that a woman who can’t carry on with multiple men without being deemed a whore.

Thesis 3: More black female led interracial relationships will benefit black people as a whole.

The same way competition forces business to adjust their prices and practices, competition shapes human mating behavior. A man who is less attractive will try to make up for it through humor, accumulating wealth, or other such mechanisms.So it logically follows that if black women outdated and outmarried in the same numbers as black men,  black women would step their game up and adapt to the new competition.

One of the biggest problems with black women’s determination to marry within the race is the inequality. Tyler Perry movies tout the “Blue Collar Brother” as the answer but the truth is, how many bus drivers have the heart of a poet? How many mechanics have the talent, drive and ambition to open their own auto shop and thrive? Marriages are based on shared values, and a weed smoking high school dropout who lives with his mama, or even the electrician with the associate’s degree who grew up in the hood, likely have little in common with a woman who went to an Ivy League school and works for a multinational corporation. That’s not good or bad, it just is. Suburbanite that I am, I’ll be the first one to admit that I dropped a potential suitor like a hot potato because he did a little “dope boy magic” in addition to his college internship. If the choice is ride or die, I’ll just walk. Basically, compatibility in a marriage relationship goes far, far beyond race.

At the end of the day, it’s about the children. Marriage isn’t what’s good for children–healthy, functional relationships between the two parents are. However, it’s hard to provide this stability between two people who are ill suited to each other. White middle class men arguably have much more in common when it comes to values than middle class black women and blue collar brothers. Furthermore, since white men and women outmarry at more equal rates and white men vastly outnumber black men, the man shortage disappears. Black women don’t have to settle for a lack of monogamy, and they can avoid the health consequences that come with it.

Thesis 4: It’s more than just numbers. 

A) Desire. At the heart of the interracial dating issue is the fact that many black women are either not attracted to white men at all, or just have a strong preference for black men–the way some men have a preference for women with light skin, long hair, or big boobs. What’s so wrong with it? Nothing really, and there’s no way to make someone feel attraction where there is none.

B) The Black Family. Some black women (like myself, admittedly) feel they have a duty to preserve the black family. As interracial marriages increase, we are moving closer to a beige America and some of us want to preserve the culture in our own small way. But the big issue is loyalty. Some women also feel that it would be a slap in the face to their beloved fathers, brothers and grandfathers to marry outside the race. The world still looks down on black men and it’s our job to lift them up, right? Well…not really. At least, not in the way that we’ve been doing.  Marrying outside the race doesn’t mean that you think black men are unworthy, and you don’t have to stop supporting the black community just because you marry outside of it. Black men feel no such loyalty to their women; marrying a white/Asian/Latina woman doesn’t mean to them that they love their mothers, sisters and cousins any less.

This is the really complicated bit. My sister is one of the few intrepid souls to try dating a white man; coincidentally, so is her best girlfriend! And they’re happy together. My brother and father don’t feel in any way put out by her choice. But many families aren’t as open as mine; in fact, some of my extended relatives still look at her boyfriend as an exotic and expect the drama to pop off at any moment. But even if they were to break up, that doesn’t mean interracial dating is a failure. Most relationships don’t make it to marriage, regardless of the two people’s race. Still, it’s hard to go against a lifetime of social conditioning, much less do so amid the objections of the people you hold dear.

C) Reciprocity. A study by the dating website OkCupid revealed that black women got the least responses to their personal messages. Closer examination of the data showed that other minority men–Native Americans, Asians, and Latinos–were all very likely to respond to black women, but black men were the least responsive, with white men in second. The racial divide goes both ways, and many white men think that women won’t be attracted to them. And black women are afraid of being treated as a fetish object. Their fears are not unreasonable–just look at the decades of sexual exploitation at the hands of white slaveowners, and the hypersexualization of black women that still saturates the media of today

Although Is Marriage for White People is a rather slim volume, Banks packs in a ton of information. I’ve merely summarized the main points of the book,  but I still highly recommend that you give it a read. While interracial dating is presented

 
 

Tags: , , , ,

Justice can see just fine

 

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. I am not licensed to give legal advice. This is a commentary on basic theories put forth in legal education. Absolutely nothing in this post or this blog should be construed as legal advice.

Alrighty then, let’s get to it. As a black person, law school completely shatters any remaining notions you may have had that justice is blind and impartial. Bullshiggity. As my AP US History teacher told us, “The Constitution was written by and for rich white male property owners.” Despite amendments to the contrary, it remains that way in fact. The problem is not so much with the machinations of the legal system as with access. Except for cases of criminal defendants, lawyers ain’t free. You gotta pay to play in the court system.

Sometimes (okay, make that a lot of times), what’s legal isn’t always right or fair. For instance, unless you work for the government your boss can do just about anything short of harassment. Unpaid overtime? Consistently changing your hours at the last minute? Making you reschedule your vacation even though you put in for it six months ago and have someone to cover your work? All legal, and doubly so if you’re in an “at will” employment state (meaning you don’t sign a contract to work for them). So what if that baby isn’t yours…if you were married when she was born, you gotta take care of her (assumed paternity). If you promised your baby mama that you’d pay child support as long as she didn’t take you to court and later found out you weren’t the father…sorry, you’re a daddy now! Pay up.*

The latest legal issue to irk me is the Wal-Mart wage discrimination case. The Supreme Court denied class action certification** because the class, which was thousands of female employees, was unmanageably large. Having just finished my second semester of Civil Procedure, my legal mind gets it. We owe fairness to the defendant as well as the plaintiffs, and trying to decide how to provide relief in the form of money damages would be problematic. Trying to prove that Walmart had an overarching policy of discrimination that trickled down into the management of hundreds of thousands of stores, is problematic. However, Walmart is a multibillion dollar international corporation. In order to ensure efficiency and uniformity of management, common sense says that if you can find more than one store in more than one state that discriminates against women, they’re all doing it. At any case, that’t the crux of the issue to be tried! Courts are supposed to be efficient, but we live in a world of Big Business and the courts have a responsibility to adjudicate the big messes they create. And they shouldn’t get to brush off a case simply because it would be hard to prosecute.

 

*How in the world you can sleep with two men before getting pregnant and believe one to definitely be the father “in good faith” is patently ridiculous to me.
 
1 Comment

Posted by on December 5, 2011 in law, musings

 

Tags: , ,

Master of my domain (name)

I think I’m just about ready to come out of the blogging closet. Although I’ve had this blog for a little over two years, I’ve never had any issues with harassing commenters or things of that nature. I don’t publicize it, but several of my real life friends have the link and nothing’s stopping them from sharing it. Shoot, even if they did, I’m not in the business of gossip and name calling so there’s no drama to be found. Besides, I can blog under my nickname and still preserve some googlenymity.

Anyway, I started this blog at a different point in my life. I’m still in transition, to be sure, but the title “Maybe So, Maybe No” doesn’t reflect my mindset anymore. I know what I want. I have the end goal in mind–I’m just trying to figure out how to get there. I am much more confident in my own voice and what I have to say. I’m not trying to get more attention, I just want to be represented. I read a lot of great blogs but none of them really represents more than one or two aspects of me. I’m proud of who I am and who I’m becoming, and I’m ready to claim it.

So, within the next month or so this will be merged into a new blog (with notice posted here beforehand, of course). Thanks for reading!

 
1 Comment

Posted by on December 5, 2011 in blogging

 

Tags: ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.